Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 146 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 146 Next Page
Page Background

11

Commercial Real Estate Lending Concentrations

As a part of their regulatory oversight, the federal regulators have issued guidelines on sound risk management practices

with respect to a financial institution’s concentrations in commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending activities. These

guidelines were issued in response to the agencies’ concerns that rising CRE concentrations might expose institutions

to unanticipated earnings and capital volatility in the event of adverse changes in the commercial real estate market.

The guidelines identify certain concentration levels that, if exceeded, will expose the institution to additional supervi-

sory analysis with regard to the institution’s CRE concentration risk. The guidelines are designed to promote appro-

priate levels of capital and sound loan and risk management practices for institutions with a concentration of CRE loans.

In general, the guidelines establish two concentration levels: first, if the institution’s total construction, land develop-

ment and other land loans represent 100 percent or more of total risk-based capital; and second, if total loans for

construction, land development and other land and loans secured by multifamily and non-owner occupied non-farm

residential properties (excluding loans secured by owner-occupied properties) represent 300 percent or more of total

risk-based capital and the institution’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50 percent or more during

the prior 36 month period. The Bank believes that the guidelines are applicable to it, as it has a relatively high concen-

tration in CRE loans. The Bank and its board of directors have discussed the guidelines and believe that the Bank’s

underwriting policies, management information systems, independent credit administration process, and monitoring of

real estate loan concentrations are sufficient to address the guidelines.

Other Pending and Proposed Legislation

Other legislative and regulatory initiatives which could affect the Company, the Bank and the banking industry in

general are pending, and additional initiatives may be proposed or introduced before the United States Congress, the

California legislature and other governmental bodies in the future. Such proposals, if enacted, may further alter the

structure, regulation and competitive relationship among financial institutions, and may subject the Bank to increased

regulation, disclosure and reporting requirements. In addition, the various banking regulatory agencies often adopt new

rules and regulations to implement and enforce existing legislation. It cannot be predicted whether, or in what form,

any such legislation or regulations may be enacted or the extent to which the business of the Company or the Bank

would be affected thereby.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this Annual Report

before making investment decisions concerning the Company’s common stock. The risks and uncertainties described

below are not the only ones the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company,

or that the Company currently believes are immaterial, may also adversely impact the Company’s business. If any of

the events described in the following risk factors occur, the Company’s business, results of operations and financial

condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could

decline due to any of the events described in these risks.

Risks Relating to the Bank and to the Business of Banking in General

Our business has been and may in the future be adversely affected by volatile conditions in the financial markets

and unfavorable economic conditions generally.

From December 2007 through June 2009, the U.S. economy was

officially in recession. Business activity across a wide range of industries and regions in the U.S. was greatly reduced

during the recession and in the ensuing years, and remains at subdued levels in some parts of the country today. The

financial markets and the financial services industry in particular suffered unprecedented disruption, causing a large

number of institutions to fail or to require government intervention to avoid failure.

As a result of the adverse financial and economic conditions noted in the previous paragraph, many lending institutions,

including our Company, experienced material deterioration in the performance of their loans, particularly construction,

development and land loans, and unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Consequently, our nonperforming assets

and credit costs (primarily our loan loss provision, net costs associated with other real estate owned, legal expense, and

appraisal costs) increased significantly during and after the recession. The Company’s nonperforming assets reached

$80 million, or 8.54% of total loans and foreclosed assets in September 2009, relative to only $689,000, or 0.08% of

total loans and foreclosed assets at the end of 2006, prior to the recession. Our credit quality has substantially improved

over the past few years, with total nonperforming assets reduced to $13 million, or 1.13% of total loans plus foreclosed